Substantive decisions stand on their own. The scheduled check-ins, skips and daily closes are kept as the operational log they are — typed, collapsible, and never dressed up as decisions.
47 after 5 Sep 19:55 founder-context-request decision; 46 after 19:50 reassessment; 45 live at audit; 35 in the earlier capture (both kept).
Exactly what is missing that only Janhavi can answer, why held evidence cannot answer it, and what changes per answer?
WP5 replanning outcome 2; reassessment at 19:50 closed what evidence can say; the next authorised Vision item is the focused request.
Evidence sought: ev-vision-gaps-reassess-1950-2026-09-05, ev-gap-analysis-0055-2026-09-05
Evidence used: ev-vision-gaps-reassess-1950-2026-09-05, ev-gap-analysis-0055-2026-09-05, ev-routecheck-1420-2026-08-30, ev-deepen-or-discard-0255-2026-09-05, ev-founder-context-request-1955-2026-09-05
Focused request published on Founder input and a dated page. Asks: (1) who pays — role/firm type/situation; (2) why they pay — what is expensive or painful enough today; (3) optional — a channel Janhavi already has this month. Each ask states what changes. Offer shape held and out of scope. Parked cut untouched. Autonomous Vision progress now waits on her answers.
Which of the three Vision gaps (who pays / why they pay / how we reach them) can held evidence already answer, and which need Janhavi?
The 07:55 diagnosis proposed this reassessment; the 10:50 Vision-first steer confirmed it; execute now rather than wait for a :55 slot.
Evidence sought: ev-gap-analysis-0055-2026-09-05, ev-routecheck-1420-2026-08-30, ev-deepen-or-discard-0255-2026-09-05
Evidence used: ev-gap-analysis-0055-2026-09-05, ev-routecheck-1420-2026-08-30, ev-deepen-or-discard-0255-2026-09-05, ev-vision-first-steer-2026-09-05, ev-vision-gaps-reassess-1950-2026-09-05
Dispositions: who-pays = needs-Janhavi; why-pay = needs-Janhavi; how-reach = still-open-with-next-test (channel-shape test once who is named). Offer shape confirmed held from founder context, still unconnected. No customer named. Route count still 0. Parked cut untouched.
Does the first-customer cut stay parked while market paths are explored?
Janhavi set the sequencing: customer cut parked; market paths first.
Evidence sought: —
Evidence used: —
Cut parked; protection stands: do not unpark. C1/C2 later prepared (4–5 Sep) but not activated.
Should Founder View and Agent View be peer surfaces with a toggle?
So Janhavi can read the founder surface and inspect the agent record one click away.
Evidence sought: —
Evidence used: ev-peer-toggle-hindsight
Released 26 Aug 2026. The only founder-visible layer released in the scored period; the standing score moved from 0 to 1 at the 27 Aug close on this.
Can any path candidate run end to end — who / why pay / how reach / what next?
Stop mapping; test whether a route actually holds together end to end.
Evidence sought: ev-routecheck-1420-2026-08-30
Evidence used: ev-routecheck-1420-2026-08-30
None did. The count stands at 0. Blocker named: reach — how the first professional hour is found and sold.
Deepen the attempted route or discard it?
A route that cannot be deepened into who/why/reach answers should not absorb more hours.
Evidence sought: ev-deepen-or-discard-0255-2026-09-05
Evidence used: ev-deepen-or-discard-0255-2026-09-05
Discarded. Typed as plan-changing learning — a rejection, not routine volume.
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
The morning decision window asked once; Janhavi answered ~10:50, after the 10:25 deadline — recorded as answered-after-deadline, applied from receipt, no retroactive rewrite.
Evidence sought: —
Evidence used: ev-vision-first-steer-2026-09-05
Vision first. Research is NOT the missing piece. Supersedes 'continue thin honesty/recon' as the default next work.
What does a third consecutive unchanged hour mean?
Three unchanged hours is a signal about the plan, not about the hour.
Evidence sought: ev-gap-analysis-0055-2026-09-05, ev-deepen-or-discard-0255-2026-09-05
Evidence used: ev-gap-analysis-0055-2026-09-05, ev-deepen-or-discard-0255-2026-09-05, ev-honesty-0755-2026-09-05
Diagnosis: the current research plan is exhausted. PROPOSED next step (labelled proposed, not done): reassess held Vision information and turn the remaining gaps into specific work; founder-only gaps become a focused request.
These are scheduled records, not judgment calls: one question asked once per window, an honest skip when no reply arrives, and the daily close answering its two standing questions.
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 10:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
answered — sequencing direction received (customer cut parked; market paths first; the parked-cut rule)
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 10:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 16:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 10:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 16:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 10:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 16:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 10:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 16:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 10:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 16:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 10:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped — the decision point did not fire (folded into the 1 Sep close record; flagged as a missed-close defect)
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 10:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 16:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 10:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 16:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 10:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 16:25), proceeded without new founder input
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 10:25), logged late ~10:55 — late evaluation labelled
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 16:25), logged late ~16:55 — late evaluation labelled
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
answered ~10:50 — 25 minutes after the 10:25 deadline; recorded as answered-after-deadline and applied from receipt (Vision first). Not a skip; no retroactive rewrite of the closed window.
Given what the last hours produced, what direction do you want for the next block?
One question, asked once; if no reply within 90 minutes the existing plan continues and the skip is logged.
skipped (no reply by 16:25), proceeded without new founder input
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 0
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 0
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 0
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 0
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 0
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 0
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 1 (held since cycle 7)
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 1 (held since cycle 7)
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 1 (held since cycle 7)
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 1 (held since cycle 7)
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 1 (held since cycle 7)
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 1 (held since cycle 7)
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 1 (held since cycle 7)
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 1 (held since cycle 7)
The two standing close questions
Did any real founder layer leave Janhavi's hands today? Did today's work move the company any closer to the goal?
no / no — no layer transfer, no goal movement; standing score 1 (held since cycle 7)
Agent record: the window records file · the close ledger · the change log