British Library BIPC filed. Market scenarios stayed thin. No path named.

Headline. Standing job is other recon, not stop. This hour read the British Library Business & IP Centre — how people who want to start or grow a business are directed into free library workshops, IP one-to-ones, and a national network of library centres — not another youth-enterprise grant programme, and not another national pro bono hub. I have not named a market. A library start-up advice network is not a customer. P (company position toward $2.5–5bn) has not moved.

Why this hour. Toward the $2.5–5bn company the first-customer cut stays parked (63e813ea); path candidates still cannot be compiled on the live gate (compile 0; blocker still reach — how a first professional hour is found and sold); this hour opens the British Library Business & IP Centre now because last recon hour was the National Pro Bono Centre in Competitor mapping, Market scenarios last filed King's Trust this afternoon, and a still-unused market-scenarios reach channel — how founders are directed to start-up / IP / workshop advice through a national library network — can be read without inventing a buyer. Hold = no invention, not no recon.

What it does to the live doll gate. Nothing that opens it. Path candidates still cannot be compiled. Compile stays 0. The hour filed a market-scenarios reach channel on Agent View. It did not compile a candidate and did not install the productised-menu bucket as a path.

Grade. STAYED THIN. Honesty: it is not a path. Who / why / how / next are still missing. A library BIPC / how-founders-are-directed-to-start-up-advice lane is not who / why / how / next.

Latest. The British Library’s Business & IP Centre is live as a public national-library programme: free to join, based at the Library in London and in a printed national network of library centres, with start-up workshops, a two-day Kickstart programme, a Get Ready scale-up track with printed turnover thresholds, IP one-to-ones, and premium market databases behind a free Reader Pass at St Pancras. The site says the centre is twenty this year and that it supports tens of thousands of people a year; those counts stay as printed claims, not a census I re-ran. Who / why they would pay / how FYJ reaches them / what sits next are still missing. A library start-up advice network is not a customer.

Open the file. 31 Aug 16:55 research · Agent View evidence file

P unchanged. p-evidence.md stays empty so the score cannot be faked. market-paths.md still starts No path named yet.

Cut still parked (63e813ea). The customer cut is a milestone / north star, not the live job. Not unparked this hour. Contract 63e813ea is live.

Walk. Destination ($2.5–5bn) → first-customer gate (parked, 63e813ea) → live gate (path candidates still cannot be compiled; compile 0; blocker still reach) → this route (Market scenarios / British Library BIPC how-founders-are-directed-to-start-up-advice, stayed thin as a path, not a named path; original six buckets are Agent View labels only) → this hour’s finding (stayed thin as a path) → does not name a customer, does not move P, does not unpark the cut.

This page sits under Evidence. It is a dated record. It does not move heading. The working file stays on Agent View. Hermes parked. This hour worked a reach channel on the live compile-paths gate, not “which of the original six”.

08:55 direction window already closed at 10:25 with no reply (logged at 10:55). This hour does not re-ask and does not re-log a second skip. 14:55 decision hour never wrote today (missed; 15:55 already noted; not re-asked from this hour).

Pushback invited — decide or criticise

Working set, not exhaustive. Criticism of this recon — deepen, drop, or change perimeter — not "name a market so the hour has a title" and not "which of the original six".
1. Is the British Library Business & IP Centre the right Market scenarios lane to deepen next — keep reading how a national library network directs people into start-up workshops and IP clinics, or is one filing enough context?
2. Should I drop BIPC as enough already for FYJ invention-risk — a free public-library programme will never name who pays us — and look for a different Market scenarios lane entirely?
3. Is “how founders are directed to start-up / IP / workshop advice through a library network” still the right perimeter for the live gate — should the next hour test a different blocker shape, or stay on reach without naming a buyer?

Confirmation

Contract UUID 26e4abb6-3b66-4a66-a4f7-d4c065ad9233 is live. Hold = no invention, not no recon. Standing work is recon until end-to-end paths emerge and value-forming is visible. No path named. P unchanged. Customer cut parked.
One line: 63e813ea is live (parked).
e834b2f2 compile still 0; blocker still reach. 58cd58c1 Founder View is the story. 06657cd0 pages shareable. f7c2a04e voice walk. c7b2e14a short Evidence. Hermes parked. Slot unchanged. Layer unchanged.