Antler filed. Market scenarios stayed thin. No path named.

Headline. Standing job is other recon, not stop. This hour read Antler — the preferred market-scenarios host for how founders are reached through an early-stage residency and capital programme — not LawCare again, and not Entrepreneur First or Founders Factory again. I have not named a market. A VC residency is not a customer. P (company position toward $2.5–5bn) has not moved.

Why this hour. Toward the $2.5–5bn company the first-customer cut stays parked (63e813ea); path candidates still cannot be compiled on the live gate (compile 0; blocker still reach — how a first professional hour is found and sold); last recon hour was LawCare competitor mapping, so this hour rotates to Market scenarios and reads Antler as a public early-stage residency / capital reach channel next to Entrepreneur First and Founders Factory without inventing a buyer. Hold = no invention, not no recon.

What it does to the live doll gate. Nothing that opens it. Path candidates still cannot be compiled. Compile stays 0. The hour filed another market-scenarios note on Agent View. An early-stage VC residency does not close the reach blocker. It did not compile a candidate and did not install the productised-menu bucket as a path.

Grade. STAYED THIN. Honesty: it is not a path. Who / why / how / next are still missing.

Latest. www.antler.co is up as Antler — Where Founders Go Further, Faster. Global early-stage VC; Pitch Us / Apply; London residency printed as an eight-week sprint; next UK residency September 2026 (the page prints both 22 and 23 — left unreconciled); up to £500,000 at inception and pre-seed printed as a site claim; portfolio directory prints 1,800+ companies. Privacy names Antler Innovation Pte Ltd (with Vincere Technologies Pte Ltd) at 128 Prinsep Street, Singapore — no UK Companies House number on the live pages, so none was invented and Companies House was not opened. This sits next to Entrepreneur First and Founders Factory as how founders are reached by a programme — not who FYJ sells to. Residency applicants are not a customer.

Open the file. 2 Sep 15:55 research · Agent View evidence file

P unchanged. p-evidence.md stays empty so the score cannot be faked. market-paths.md still starts No path named yet.

Cut still parked (63e813ea). The customer cut is a milestone / north star, not the live job. Not unparked this hour. Contract 63e813ea is live (parked).

Walk. Destination ($2.5–5bn) → first-customer gate (parked, 63e813ea) → live gate (path candidates still cannot be compiled; compile 0; blocker still reach) → this route (Market scenarios / Antler early-stage residency + capital reach + printed Singapore Pte Ltd privacy trail, stayed thin, not a named path; original six buckets are Agent View labels only) → this hour’s finding (stayed thin) → does not name a customer, does not move P, does not unpark the cut.

This page sits under Evidence. It is a dated record. It does not move heading. The working file stays on Agent View. Hermes parked. This hour worked Market-scenarios filing on the live compile-paths gate, not “which of the original six”.

08:55 already skipped ~11:55 (no reply by 10:25). Proceeded without new founder input. 10:55 did not fire this cycle (no file, no hour-log row) — noted; not FAIL. 14:55 was decision-ask only; window until 16:25 still open; Reply still open; not skipped; not re-asked. 17:15 close already ran at 17:32 — not re-closed this hour.

Pushback invited — decide or criticise

Working set, not exhaustive. Criticism of this recon — deepen, drop, or change perimeter — not "name a market so the hour has a title" and not "which of the original six".
1. Is an Antler residency / capital programme enough market-scenarios context next to Entrepreneur First / Founders Factory, or should the next hour deepen on the UK residency Apply surface without treating applicants as a buyer?
2. Should I drop early-stage VC / residency hosts as enough already for FYJ invention-risk — a programme will never be FYJ’s buyer — and look for a different Market scenarios lane entirely?
3. Next unused preferred fallback is Seedcamp (live) or Bethnal Green Ventures (live) or Capital Enterprise (live) — should the next hour take the Seedcamp early-stage capital perimeter?
4. Is “how founders are reached by residency / capital programmes” still the right perimeter for the live gate — should the next hour test a different blocker shape, or stay on programme hosts without naming a buyer?

Confirmation

Contract UUID 26e4abb6-3b66-4a66-a4f7-d4c065ad9233 is live. Hold = no invention, not no recon. Standing work is recon until end-to-end paths emerge and value-forming is visible. No path named. P unchanged. Customer cut parked.
One line: 63e813ea is live (parked).
e834b2f2 compile still 0; blocker still reach. 58cd58c1 Founder View is the story. 06657cd0 pages shareable. f7c2a04e voice walk. c7b2e14a short Evidence. Hermes parked. Slot unchanged. Layer unchanged (Peer toggle: Founder View ↔ Agent View).
08:55 already skipped ~11:55. Proceeded without new founder input. 10:55 did not fire this cycle — noted. 14:55 window until 16:25 still open — not skipped, not re-asked. 17:15 close already ran at 17:32 — not re-closed this hour.