National Pro Bono Centre filed. Competitor mapping stayed thin. No path named.

Headline. Standing job is other recon, not stop. This hour read the National Pro Bono Centre — how the public and the profession are directed to free / pro bono legal help through a national hub that does not itself advise individuals — not another tribunal-representation charity, and not another tech trade association. I have not named a market. A pro bono hub is not a customer. P (company position toward $2.5–5bn) has not moved.

Why this hour. Toward the $2.5–5bn company the first-customer cut stays parked (63e813ea); path candidates still cannot be compiled on the live gate (compile 0; blocker still reach — how a first professional hour is found and sold); this hour opens the National Pro Bono Centre now because last recon hour was techUK in Companies in the space, Competitor mapping last filed FRU this morning, and a still-unused competitor-mapping reach channel — how people and lawyers are routed to free / pro bono help through the national centre — can be read without inventing a buyer. Hold = no invention, not no recon.

What it does to the live doll gate. Nothing that opens it. Path candidates still cannot be compiled. Compile stays 0. The hour filed a competitor-mapping reach channel on Agent View. It did not compile a candidate and did not install the productised-menu bucket as a path.

Grade. STAYED THIN. Honesty: it is not a path. Who / why / how / next are still missing. A national pro bono hub / signposting lane is not who / why / how / next.

Latest. The National Pro Bono Centre is live as a registered charity (1137708) and a limited-by-guarantee company (07226359, from 2010). It is a sector hub: it does not give legal advice or representation to individuals. Public pages cover About, What we do, volunteer routing for solicitors / barristers / in-house lawyers / students, Pro Bono Connect matching, Pro Bono Expert Support, and Pro Bono Week (23rd year printed). People looking for help are signposted to LawWorks, Advocate, Citizens Advice, law centres, AdviceNow and ombudsman schemes. Charity Commission YE 2024 income about £243k / spend about £265k; six trustees / twelve volunteers printed. Who / why they would pay / how FYJ reaches them / what sits next are still missing. A pro bono hub is not a customer.

Open the file. 31 Aug 15:55 research · Agent View evidence file

P unchanged. p-evidence.md stays empty so the score cannot be faked. market-paths.md still starts No path named yet.

Cut still parked (63e813ea). The customer cut is a milestone / north star, not the live job. Not unparked this hour. Contract 63e813ea is live.

Walk. Destination ($2.5–5bn) → first-customer gate (parked, 63e813ea) → live gate (path candidates still cannot be compiled; compile 0; blocker still reach) → this route (Competitor mapping / National Pro Bono Centre how-the-public-and-profession-are-directed-to-free-pro-bono-help, stayed thin as a path, not a named path; original six buckets are Agent View labels only) → this hour’s finding (stayed thin as a path) → does not name a customer, does not move P, does not unpark the cut.

This page sits under Evidence. It is a dated record. It does not move heading. The working file stays on Agent View. Hermes parked. This hour worked a reach channel on the live compile-paths gate, not “which of the original six”.

08:55 direction window already closed at 10:25 with no reply (logged at 10:55). This hour does not re-ask and does not re-log a second skip. 14:55 decision hour never wrote today (missed; not re-asked from this hour).

Pushback invited — decide or criticise

Working set, not exhaustive. Criticism of this recon — deepen, drop, or change perimeter — not "name a market so the hour has a title" and not "which of the original six".
1. Is the National Pro Bono Centre the right Competitor mapping lane to deepen next — keep reading how a national hub signposts LawWorks / Advocate / law centres, or is one filing enough context?
2. Should I drop NPBC as enough already for FYJ invention-risk — a hub that will not advise individuals will never name who pays us — and look for a different Competitor mapping lane entirely?
3. Is “how the public and the profession are directed to free / pro bono help through a national centre” still the right perimeter for the live gate — should the next hour test a different blocker shape, or stay on reach without naming a buyer?

Confirmation

Contract UUID 26e4abb6-3b66-4a66-a4f7-d4c065ad9233 is live. Hold = no invention, not no recon. Standing work is recon until end-to-end paths emerge and value-forming is visible. No path named. P unchanged. Customer cut parked.
One line: 63e813ea is live (parked).
e834b2f2 compile still 0; blocker still reach. 58cd58c1 Founder View is the story. 06657cd0 pages shareable. f7c2a04e voice walk. c7b2e14a short Evidence. Hermes parked. Slot unchanged. Layer unchanged.