CRA 2015 filed. Risk reduction got stronger as a constraint. No path named.

Headline. Standing job is other recon, not stop. This hour read the Consumer Rights Act 2015 — the UK rules on goods, digital content, services and unfair terms when you sell to a consumer — not another equity-crowdfunding platform, and not a re-read of CCR 2013. I have not named a market. A consumer-rights code is not a customer. P (company position toward $2.5–5bn) has not moved.

Why this hour. Toward the $2.5–5bn company the first-customer cut stays parked (63e813ea); path candidates still cannot be compiled on the live gate (compile 0; blocker still reach — how a first professional hour is found and sold); this hour opens CRA 2015 now because last recon hour was Seedrs in Companies in the space, and CRA was already the named unused fallback on that hour — a public goods / digital-content / services / unfair-terms constraint that sits on inventing a first hour sold to a consumer without inventing a buyer. Hold = no invention, not no recon.

What it does to the live doll gate. Nothing that opens it. Path candidates still cannot be compiled. Compile stays 0. The hour filed a risk-reduction constraint on Agent View. It did not compile a candidate and did not install the productised-menu bucket as a path.

Grade. GOT STRONGER (as a constraint on invention only). Honesty: it is not a path. Who / why / how / next are still missing. Stayed thin as a path.

Latest. CRA 2015 is live as the consumer contracts and unfair-terms code: consumer-law changes from 1 October 2015. If the buyer is a consumer, goods must be of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose and as described, with reject / repair or replacement remedies; digital content has matching quality rights and a clear repair-or-replace story; services must be performed with reasonable care and skill, with repeat-performance and price-reduction remedies; contract terms and notices must be fair. This sits next to CCR 2013 (how you sell at a distance — information, 14-day cancel, extras) and PECR (how you may market electronically), not instead of them. Who / why they would pay / how FYJ reaches them / what sits next are still missing. A consumer-rights code is not a customer.

Open the file. 1 Sep 11:55 research · Agent View evidence file

P unchanged. p-evidence.md stays empty so the score cannot be faked. market-paths.md still starts No path named yet.

Cut still parked (63e813ea). The customer cut is a milestone / north star, not the live job. Not unparked this hour. Contract 63e813ea is live.

Walk. Destination ($2.5–5bn) → first-customer gate (parked, 63e813ea) → live gate (path candidates still cannot be compiled; compile 0; blocker still reach) → this route (Risk reduction / CRA 2015 goods, digital content, services and unfair-terms rules, stronger as a constraint only, not a named path; original six buckets are Agent View labels only) → this hour’s finding (got stronger as a constraint; stayed thin as a path) → does not name a customer, does not move P, does not unpark the cut.

This page sits under Evidence. It is a dated record. It does not move heading. The working file stays on Agent View. Hermes parked. This hour worked a constraint on the live compile-paths gate, not “which of the original six”.

08:55 direction window closed at 10:25 with no reply. Proceeded without new founder input. This hour does not re-ask. 14:55 is later today — not this hour.

Pushback invited — decide or criticise

Working set, not exhaustive. Criticism of this recon — deepen, drop, or change perimeter — not "name a market so the hour has a title" and not "which of the original six".
1. Is CRA 2015 the right constraint to deepen next — keep reading goods / digital-content / services / unfair-terms next to CCR 2013 / PECR / Equality Act / ICO fee, or is one CRA filing enough context?
2. Should I drop CRA as enough already for FYJ invention-risk — a consumer-rights code will never name who pays us — and look for a different Risk reduction lane entirely?
3. Is “how the first professional hour is found and sold” still the right perimeter for the live gate — should the next hour test a different blocker shape, or stay on reach without naming a buyer?
4. Next unused fallbacks are Google for Startups UK (market scenarios), SyndicateRoom (companies in the space, not Seedrs again), or a genuinely new public bulletin — which perimeter should the next hour take?

Confirmation

Contract UUID 26e4abb6-3b66-4a66-a4f7-d4c065ad9233 is live. Hold = no invention, not no recon. Standing work is recon until end-to-end paths emerge and value-forming is visible. No path named. P unchanged. Customer cut parked.
One line: 63e813ea is live (parked).
e834b2f2 compile still 0; blocker still reach. 58cd58c1 Founder View is the story. 06657cd0 pages shareable. f7c2a04e voice walk. c7b2e14a short Evidence. Hermes parked. Slot unchanged. Layer unchanged. 08:55 skipped (no reply by 10:25). 14:55 later today — not this hour.