CCR 2013 filed. Risk reduction got stronger as a constraint. No path named.

Headline. Standing job is other recon, not stop. This hour read the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013 — the UK rules on information, 14-day cancellation and extra charges when you sell to a consumer online or at a distance — not another advice-sector grant-maker, and not a re-read of PECR. I have not named a market. A distance-selling code is not a customer. P (company position toward $2.5–5bn) has not moved.

Why this hour. Toward the $2.5–5bn company the first-customer cut stays parked (63e813ea); path candidates still cannot be compiled on the live gate (compile 0; blocker still reach — how a first professional hour is found and sold); this hour opens CCR 2013 now because last recon hour was Access to Justice Foundation in Competitor mapping, and CCR was already the named unused fallback on that hour — a public distance-contract / cancellation constraint that sits on selling a first hour online without inventing a buyer. Hold = no invention, not no recon.

What it does to the live doll gate. Nothing that opens it. Path candidates still cannot be compiled. Compile stays 0. The hour filed a risk-reduction constraint on Agent View. It did not compile a candidate and did not install the productised-menu bucket as a path.

Grade. GOT STRONGER (as a constraint on invention only). Honesty: it is not a path. Who / why / how / next are still missing. Stayed thin as a path.

Latest. CCR 2013 is live as the distance and off-premises consumer-contracts code: made 11 December 2013, in force since 13 June 2014. If the buyer is a consumer, selling a service online or at a distance means clear pre-contract information, a durable confirmation, and usually a 14-day right to cancel without giving a reason; missing the cancellation notice can stretch that window. Extra charges need a real yes — a pre-ticked box does not count. GOV.UK’s distance-selling pages say the same story in plain English. This sits next to PECR (how you may market electronically), not instead of it. Who / why they would pay / how FYJ reaches them / what sits next are still missing. A cancellation-and-information code is not a customer.

Open the file. 1 Sep 04:55 research · Agent View evidence file

P unchanged. p-evidence.md stays empty so the score cannot be faked. market-paths.md still starts No path named yet.

Cut still parked (63e813ea). The customer cut is a milestone / north star, not the live job. Not unparked this hour. Contract 63e813ea is live.

Walk. Destination ($2.5–5bn) → first-customer gate (parked, 63e813ea) → live gate (path candidates still cannot be compiled; compile 0; blocker still reach) → this route (Risk reduction / CCR 2013 distance-contract information, 14-day cancellation and additional-charges rules, stronger as a constraint only, not a named path; original six buckets are Agent View labels only) → this hour’s finding (got stronger as a constraint; stayed thin as a path) → does not name a customer, does not move P, does not unpark the cut.

This page sits under Evidence. It is a dated record. It does not move heading. The working file stays on Agent View. Hermes parked. This hour worked a constraint on the live compile-paths gate, not “which of the original six”.

08:55 and 14:55 decision windows are not this hour. This hour does not ask and does not re-log a skip. Night of 31 Aug–1 Sep is still running; no new overnight page.

Pushback invited — decide or criticise

Working set, not exhaustive. Criticism of this recon — deepen, drop, or change perimeter — not "name a market so the hour has a title" and not "which of the original six".
1. Is CCR 2013 the right constraint to deepen next — keep reading distance / cancellation / additional-charges next to PECR / Equality Act / ICO fee, or is one CCR filing enough context?
2. Should I drop CCR as enough already for FYJ invention-risk — a distance-selling code will never name who pays us — and look for a different Risk reduction lane entirely?
3. Is “how the first professional hour is found and sold” still the right perimeter for the live gate — should the next hour test a different blocker shape, or stay on reach without naming a buyer?

Confirmation

Contract UUID 26e4abb6-3b66-4a66-a4f7-d4c065ad9233 is live. Hold = no invention, not no recon. Standing work is recon until end-to-end paths emerge and value-forming is visible. No path named. P unchanged. Customer cut parked.
One line: 63e813ea is live (parked).
e834b2f2 compile still 0; blocker still reach. 58cd58c1 Founder View is the story. 06657cd0 pages shareable. f7c2a04e voice walk. c7b2e14a short Evidence. Hermes parked. Slot unchanged. Layer unchanged.