Access to Justice Foundation filed. Competitor mapping stayed thin. No path named.

Headline. Standing job is other recon, not stop. This hour read the Access to Justice Foundation — the UK grant-maker that funds free legal advice organisations (atjf.org.uk) — not another self-help guide site, and not a re-read of JUSTICE. I have not named a market. Organisations that get ATJF grants, or people facing a legal problem, are not a customer. P (company position toward $2.5–5bn) has not moved.

Why this hour. Toward the $2.5–5bn company the first-customer cut stays parked (63e813ea); path candidates still cannot be compiled on the live gate (compile 0; blocker still reach — how a first professional hour is found and sold); this hour opens ATJF now because last recon hour was Virgin StartUp in Market scenarios, and ATJF was already the named unused fallback on that hour and on 00:55 AdviceNow — another how-the-public-is-directed-to-legal-help channel can be read without inventing a buyer. Hold = no invention, not no recon.

What it does to the live doll gate. Nothing that opens it. Path candidates still cannot be compiled. Compile stays 0. The hour filed a competitor-mapping reach channel on Agent View. It did not compile a candidate and did not install the productised-menu bucket as a path.

Grade. STAYED THIN. Honesty: it is not a path. Who / why / how / next are still missing. A grant-maker that funds free-advice organisations is not who / why / how / next.

Latest. The Access to Justice Foundation is live as a limited-by-guarantee charity (footer: company 6714178; England and Wales charity 1126147; Scotland SC048584) at 7 Bell Yard, WC2A 2JR. About says it is the only funder dedicated exclusively to increasing free legal support, advice and representation nationwide, and that it is the prescribed charity for Pro Bono Costs Orders and for undistributed damages from Competition Appeal Tribunal opt-out collective actions. Contact is blunt: they do not give legal advice or representation, they do not fund individuals, and grants go to advice organisations — they point the public at Advicelocal. The live Legal Support Grant 2026–2029 is a Ministry of Justice programme they deliver in England and Wales: £15 million from 1 October 2026 to 31 March 2029; applications are closed; they aim to tell applicants in September 2026. Homepage figures for 2024 (£14.67 million granted / £13.28 million income / 92% of funds raised used for grants) match the Charity Commission year to 31 December 2024 on income. Companies House 06714178 shows the company active from 2 October 2008 (SIC 94990). Commission internal record 4042003 is readable this hour (the charity-number URL 404s); it prints 15 employees and 13 trustees against 14 named staff cards and 15 named trustee cards on the site — left as they stand, not collapsed. OSCR SC048584 is active from 27 July 2018 and prints staff 14. Who / why they would pay / how FYJ reaches them / what sits next are still missing. Grantees and people facing a legal problem are not a customer.

Open the file. 1 Sep 03:55 research · Agent View evidence file

P unchanged. p-evidence.md stays empty so the score cannot be faked. market-paths.md still starts No path named yet.

Cut still parked (63e813ea). The customer cut is a milestone / north star, not the live job. Not unparked this hour. Contract 63e813ea is live.

Walk. Destination ($2.5–5bn) → first-customer gate (parked, 63e813ea) → live gate (path candidates still cannot be compiled; compile 0; blocker still reach) → this route (Competitor mapping / Access to Justice Foundation how-the-public-is-directed-to-legal-help via an advice-sector grant-maker, stayed thin as a path, not a named path; original six buckets are Agent View labels only) → this hour’s finding (stayed thin as a path) → does not name a customer, does not move P, does not unpark the cut.

This page sits under Evidence. It is a dated record. It does not move heading. The working file stays on Agent View. Hermes parked. This hour worked a reach channel on the live compile-paths gate, not “which of the original six”.

08:55 and 14:55 decision windows are not this hour. This hour does not ask and does not re-log a skip. Night of 31 Aug–1 Sep is still running; no new overnight page.

Pushback invited — decide or criticise

Working set, not exhaustive. Criticism of this recon — deepen, drop, or change perimeter — not "name a market so the hour has a title" and not "which of the original six".
1. Is ATJF the right Competitor mapping lane to deepen next — keep reading how an advice-sector grant-maker sits next to AdviceNow / Law Centres / Citizens Advice, or is one filing enough context?
2. Should I drop ATJF as enough already for FYJ invention-risk — a funder of free-advice organisations will never name who pays us — and look for a different Competitor mapping lane entirely?
3. Is “how the public is directed to legal help via a grant-maker” still the right perimeter for the live gate — should the next hour test a different blocker shape, or stay on reach without naming a buyer?

Confirmation

Contract UUID 26e4abb6-3b66-4a66-a4f7-d4c065ad9233 is live. Hold = no invention, not no recon. Standing work is recon until end-to-end paths emerge and value-forming is visible. No path named. P unchanged. Customer cut parked.
One line: 63e813ea is live (parked).
e834b2f2 compile still 0; blocker still reach. 58cd58c1 Founder View is the story. 06657cd0 pages shareable. f7c2a04e voice walk. c7b2e14a short Evidence. Hermes parked. Slot unchanged. Layer unchanged.